|
managing a wild horse with a rotten rope: a contemporary history of okinawa
Chapter One
Part Five
1-5. Forests (Somayama), Land Use, and Social Structure in Rural Okinawa
Most of Okinawa’s magiri had no stake in the island's tributary transit trade being conducted out of Tomari Port, Naha. As such, Satsuma's assumption of control had no direct effect on the average, particularly rural, household. Indirectly, of course, the Shuri Ofu would be looking to recoup some of its losses by placing heavier demands on agrarian communities. The new era of, technically at least, being a vassal state of both Japan and China (nisshi ryozoku), produced significant changes in areas far from Shuri. Whereas Ming China had not interfered in the island's affairs Satsuma adopted a hands-on approach. An insistence on greater efficiency in resource management and the need for increased agricultural productivity resulted in a more visible Ofu involvement in village affairs. Ofu personnel from various agencies arrived in the rural magiri in ever greater numbers throughout the 17th and 18th centuries. At the same time, only a few of the northern districts still possessed pristine forest areas. The decision to carefully manage and protect these dwindling resources led to a shift in the lives of northern villagers who had hitherto simply felled whatever they required for lumber or fuel.
As previously stated, population increases, the relocation of the anji to Shuri, advances in Okinawan ship construction, and increased production of wood-based items, all had the cumulative effect of placing severe pressure on the island's timber resources. Given that Okinawa Island had once been thick with woods and forests the degree of depletion in the southern and into central parts of the island during the 16th and early-17th century was astonishing. The first Ryukyu King to be invested in the post-Satsuma invasion era, Sho Ho,[1] attempted to put the brakes on rampant felling in the southern part of Okinawa, expanding the functions of government by establishing a Soyamabugyo:[2] effectively a forest administration, in 1628.[3] For whatever reason, though poor management and a lack of compelling punishments for offenders seem likely, this proved ineffective. When Haneji Choshu (or Sho Joken) became Sessei, or Chancellor[4] in 1666, he took the matter more seriously, banning outright the felling of certain trees and issuing forest protection directives, including the establishment of Nakagami and Kunigami (central and northern districts, respectively) Yamabugyo in 1679.[5] Again, however, this failed to stem depletion. Haneji Choshu actually allowed clearing and reclamation for cultivation of a certain amount of somayama to boost the island's food productivity.[6]
Only a century after Sho Ho established the Soyamabugyo was the problem realistically addressed. When Sai On became a member of the Sanshikan, or 'Council of State'[7] in 1728, most of the forest areas of central Okinawa Island were near to depletion and the process was underway in the five northern magiri of Kin, Onna, Nago, Motobu, and Nakijin. Only in the four northern magiri of Haneji, Ogimi, Kushi, and Kunigami, were there any pristine forest areas. Although known for many practical policies during his membership of the Sanshikan, Sai On is probably best remembered for his somayama, or timber forest, projects. Within only a 15-year period Sai On had passed seven pieces of somayama-related legislation (two in 1737, two in 1747, one in 1748, and two in 1751).[8] Collectively, these are known as the Rinsei shichisho, or Seven Writings on Forest Administration,[9] and covered methods of forest protection and reforestation, a precise outline of the duties of Yamabugyo, or 'forest magistrates,' and penalties for those breaking the laws.[10] Sai On surveyed forest areas and created beautiful maps and sketches of them.[11] What is quite remarkable is that his somayama initiatives remained standard Ofu, and thereafter Okinawa Prefectural Government, practice long after he had died.
During Sai On's period of administration three Yamabugyo districts of Kazo, Higashi, and Nishi, were established for the northern Kunigami region alone, with a total of twelve staff (yamabisa).[12] Kin magiri, along with those of Haneji and Kushi, fell under the Higashi Yamabugyo. Four staff were designated to each of the large northern Yamabugyo, with Kin and Haneji hosting one each, and Kushi two. The headquarters of the Higashi Yamabugyo was at Sedake Village, Kushi magiri.[13] Those responsible for forest administration locally were the soyama atai, the yama atai, and yamakunin, or Chief Supervisor of Forest Administration, Supervisor, and general staff, respectively. Although rules and regulations varied between villages, the villages of Kin would report somayama conditions to the magiri administration on the 1st and 15th day of each month, with the magiri reporting to the bugyo on the first day of each month. Kin magiri had one soyama atai, with yama atai and yamakunin located in each of the seven mura, or village districts of Namisato, Kin, Igei, Yaka, Kanna, Soke, and Ginoza. The bugyo would visit each district twice a year: in spring and autumn, to check on conditions, and then report his findings to the Sanshikan directly. The costs of running the bugyo with its fifty or so staff had to be absorbed by the magiri. In addition, the jitodai was obliged to pay two visits a year to the Kin village districts, in January and May, and the soyama atai every month.[14]
While the administrative structure of the magiri was detailed earlier, the 17th and 18th centuries saw greater complexity develop. After the Satsuma invasion the Ofu became involved more heavily in the affairs of agrarian communities. There were many reasons for this. In the first part, rapid population growth, combined with the regular occurrence of natural disasters, meant the Ofu had to pay particular attention to food-producing areas. Tied with this was the need for better overall resource management, as was the case with the somayama. We know that more efficient sugar cultivation techniques were introduced and supervised by the Ofu in the 17th century, and that relatively drought- and typhoon-resistant imo were planted extensively as the island's main food crop. Such macroeconomic policies could not be left in the charge of the individual village. The Ofu sent overseers into the communities. They would receive salary, however, not from the Ofu but from the community to which they were assigned, which in turn highlights a reason for the burgeoning bureaucracy in agrarian areas from the 17th century. With Shimazu's assumption of control over Ryukyu trade there was now less money circulating in Shuri itself, yet still a large number of people receiving various stipends. As such, there was a need to create positions so as to, if you will, offload some of them. Under Sai On's administration the Ofu may have run a tight ship, but this was not always the case. When the bureaucracy in rural magiri such as Kin is examined one will find a number of positions that are more honorary than practical.
Above the heimin, or commoners,[15] in the villages of Kin magiri were several distinct levels of administrators and high ranking, privileged individuals. The highest position in the magiri was the jitodai, or chief administrator, who received a total of approximately 14 koku of rice, beans, and barley in salary (hokyu) and miscellaneous income (zakkyu).[16] Just below was the Shuri ufuyaku and the Nishi ucchi, Hae ucchi, and Ufu ucchi. These four were known collectively as the sabakuri (or sabakui).[17] Although of high position in the magiri none received hokyu and zakkyu of more than 4 koku.[18] Those with the highest income were the ordinary village ucchi who were direct representatives of the Shuri-residing anji. These were receiving more than 26 koku.[19] To put these in perspective, Sai On himself received a stipend of over 80 koku of rice in 1723, some five years before becoming a member of the Sanshikan.[20] Other higher level magiri officials included two Bujito (the Igei and Yaka ufuyaku), a Soyama atai and Sokosaku atai, or 'Chief Supervisor of Agricultural Administration,' with the latter two, along with the ucchi, having a general staff. There were also the noro priestesses of Kin, Igei, Ginoza, and Kanna. As is outlined below, certain officials also received lands from which income was derived.
Isolating how and when the various land systems found in operation throughout Okinawa’s magiri came together is difficult in the absence of historical resources.[21] Methods of distributing and cultivating land would logically have evolved indigenously over the centuries, influenced at one time or another by technical knowledge acquired from other communities, from China, Japan, and beyond. It is written in the Kyuyo that a particularly harsh period in the mid-13th century saw droughts, famines, illness, and violent typhoons take the lives of half of the population.[22] This was followed by almost a half-century of positive development under King Eiso.[23] It was apparently Eiso who introduced some form of the Chinese jingtian, or well-field,[24] system of communal land cultivation into Okinawa[25] to boost agricultural productivity and systematise tax collection.[26] It appears to have been successful on both counts. The most significant event in terms of land use systems in Ryukyu prior to the Meiji reforms, however, came in 1610, just after the Satsuma invasion. While King Sho Nei was being 'entertained' in Kagoshima, Satsuma officials descended on Ryukyu to conduct a comprehensive survey of all lands (kenchi) by specific grade, assessing productivity for tax purposes. Fourteen magistrates, known as saoire bugyo, and a staff of 168 persons took more than a year to complete the project.[27] Although subsequent kenchi were conducted,[28] there was surprisingly no significant upward reassessment by Shimazu of Ryukyu's total koku value.[29] Land areas were divided into different categories in the post-1611 kenchi period.[30] Descriptions vary depending on the text one consults, but there is unanimity on the division between kanyuchi, or government lands,[31] and the shiyuchi, or private lands.
In the former category fell hyakushochi, jitochi, oekachi, and norokumoichi. The hyakushochi was the land in the use of peasant farmers and, based on the kenchi completed in 1750, constituted over 67% of land under cultivation in Ryukyu.[32] Since all lands were owned by the King, peasant farmer use of these lands was effectively a privilege. Accordingly, the hyakushochi were also known as goukechi, or 'lands received as gift.'[33] Most important was the way hyakushochi was divided and cultivated. Farmers were subject to a periodic land redistribution system known as chiwari (jiwari or jiwaki).[34] As such they were only temporary residents (kiryumin). Lands were assessed down to the very last tsubo by autonomous local community assemblies and leaders[35] in terms of fertility and productive capacity and divided up into smaller parcels and allotted to families. If a farmer was adjudged to be making poor use of a good piece of land it would be redistributed since the village community constituted a single tax unit collectively responsible for keeping productivity up.[36] Land was distributed to individual families via a complex system taking into account land type, family size, ages and, of course, sex. In as much as Kin is concerned (and as much as given in Kin-choshi, the official history of Kin) an individual portion of land ranged between 4-6 se (5.5 yards sq.). From the age of 7 to 14 a male would qualify for one portion. Upon reaching 60 or 61 land entitlement would decrease relative to one's ability to work the land.[37] In the case of women, a fraction of one portion appears to be common, with a decrease in entitlement between the ages of 50 and 60.[38] There were many variations in land distribution systems between communities. Enough to make generalisations foolish. A common misconception about pre-Meiji land ownership in Ryukyu that must be challenged, however, is that lands were communally owned by villages.[39] While they certainly were communally worked, ownership by the King or aji was never in doubt.
In terms of the other kanyuchi categories, the jitochi was technically a part of the hyakushochi, but was apportioned to the highest level of Shuri-residing district administrators with rank of Ajijito, Sojito, and Wakijito, who received approximately one-third of the profit derived from cultivation as income, or jitosakutoku. Of the remainder, one half went to the farmers and the rest in Ofu taxes and other necessary outgoings. Jitochi made up 13% of cultivated lands on Okinawa. The oekachi (or yakuchi) was land allotted to the next level down of high public administrators in the magiri and village including, in Kin, the Bujito, Shuri ufuyaku, Nishi ucchi, Hae ucchi, and Ufu ucchi. Much of the oekachi was also technically part of hyakushochi, with profits divided in a similar way to the jitochi. Okinawa-wide, oekachi constituted 7% of cultivated lands. The norokumoichi (nuruchi) was land given to the local noro priestesses.[40] The noro used a different system of land administration, contracting in farmers to cultivate the land and then managing the profits there from in business like manner. Norokumoichi constituted about 1% of lands under cultivation. What is of most importance in terms of the distribution of profits from cultivation, with the sole exception of norokumoichi, is that the farmers always ended up with one-third of the yield. As has been mentioned, if one takes into account Ryukyu's actual agricultural productivity increased from the 17th into 18th century: with more lands brought under cultivation, the modernisation of processes, and diversification of crops, yet Satsuma did not significantly increase productivity assessment from the 1611 kenchi, the life of the average farmer improved rather than worsened. As Sakihara Mitsugu points out, since the hyakusho could "supplement their food needs and income with non-rice, and therefore non-taxable, products like sweet potatoes, their life may have been at subsistence level but they did not starve."[41]
In the category of shiyuchi, there were three main classifications: shiakechi (shiakeukechi or sekiji), ukechi, and shiakechigyo. The shiakechi were lands privately owned by individuals or groups[42] who had physically cleared wooded areas or reclaimed land from the sea as a direct result of the policy initiated by Haneji Choshu in 1666 to boost the island's food productivity.[43] The system was rather short-lived, lasting 21 years until 1687, when new forest protection initiatives were introduced under Sho Shitsu. The shiakechi remained privately owned, however, throughout the Ofu period and beyond into the post-Meiji period. Owners could pass shiakechi onto the next generation if a tribute payment of 20% of annual production was paid to the Ofu. In 1750, shiakechi made up just less than 6% of all lands under cultivation in Okinawa. Ukechi was hyakushochi that had been returned to the Ofu as a result of the sickness or death of a farmer and was therefore not being cultivated. This land was sold on by the Ofu to someone of shizoku class[44] who would ensure the land was put to productive use. These lands made up just less than 4% of the total lands under cultivation. Finally, there were the shiakechigyo which was the name given to lands first brought under cultivation by those of shizoku class or village heads. This made up less than 4% of the total land. The cost of reforestation projects at this time was shared by the Ofu and local community. If farmers needed to obtain timber they had to get permission but were not required to pay compensation.
[1] At least three references suggest King Sho Ho came from the Kin Family, with the 'Kin' having identical kanji to Kin Town. Higaonna refers to the family link without commentary on the connection to Kin. Zabilka makes explicit reference to the connection between the district of Kin and the family, suggesting that after the invasion of Satsuma "the fortunes of the Kin family increased." Majikina Anko makes more compelling reference, talking about Sho Ho as being the fourth son of the third son of King Sho Gen (1556-1572), who was of the Kin family. See Majikina Anko and Shimakura Ryuji, Okinawa Issennenshi (1966), 399, Gladys Zabilka, The Customs and Culture of Okinawa (Tokyo: Charles Tuttle, 1959), 141, and Higaonna Kanjun, 'An Outline of Okinawan History,' op. cit., 34. Clearly, from the perspective of this text, such a link between Okinawan King and Kin Town would be of major interest, though the current writer is not yet convinced, being sceptical about the idea that Kin Village took on a greater prominence in Ryukyuan affairs because the Kin family inherited the throne. Official histories of Kin make no mention of the significance of Sho Ho. What does intrigue, however, is the knowledge that after Satsuma's invasion, Lord Shimazu sought to fill higher level Ofu positions with those sympathetic to Japan's involvement in Ryukyuan affairs. In as much as Kin may have been party to this shift in political power, further investigation is warranted.
[2] Kin-choshi, 65, and others. Higa Shuncho dates its establishment as being 1636. Higa Shuncho, Okinawa no rekishi (1959), 179. Although the word yama pertains to mountains or hills, it is logical in the absence of nuclear weapons or heavy quarrying that it was the forest resources rather than the mountains themselves that were in need of protection.
[3] The Monobujosho (Monobugyosho) was the smaller of two main parts of the Ofu prior to the Satsuma's invasion, and was responsible mainly for the economic and financial affairs of the island kingdom. It contained 3 principal departments: the Shotaiho, the Kyuchiho, and Yoiho. Its counterpart, the Moshikuchiza (Moshikuchiho), comprised 4 departments: the Sashinosoba, Soshigori, Hirajo, and Tomarijito handling legal, educational and ceremonial affairs. The Yamabugyo fell under the Yoiho Department of the former section. While the Moshikuchiza had been the more prestigious of the two departments the importance of the Monobujosho increased throughout the 17th and 18th centuries. For a comprehensive description of departments and functions see: Higa Shuncho, Okinawa no rekishi (1959), 268-270. Gregory Smits deals with the various Ofu departments throughout his text: Visions of Ryukyu: Identity and Ideology in Early-Modern Thought and Politics (1999).
[4] The term Sessei (Sessho) can most easily be rendered from Japanese dictionaries into English as 'regent,' but this does not really fit the position within the Okinawan context at this time since the position was not created as a result of the King being incapacitated, ill or absent. More appropriate is either 'chancellor' or 'Prime Minister,' as in contemporary Europe, with the latter being the common rendering in English language texts relating to Okinawa. The Sessei would always be a close relative of the Ryukyu King; usually a prince or anji. Higa Shuncho, Okinawa no rekishi (1959), 269.
[6] The so-called shiakechi are discussed later in this chapter.
[7] The Sanshikan (Sanshikuan) was, at this point in time, the highest Ofu body below the Sessei. These four together formed the Hyojosho, which was effectively a 'High Council.' There are various renderings of Sanshikan in English language texts related to Okinawa, ranging from 'Council of Three,' 'Regency Council of Three,' 'Three Member Regency,' or 'Council of State.' All appear to have validity. According to George Kerr, the Sanshikan became the most important administrative body after 1556. Since the throne had just passed to a prince who was mute, the Sanshikan was truly acting in the capacity of regent at that point in time. After Shimazu's invasion in 1609, the Sanshikan was regarded as the principal decision-making body. The Sessei was still the highest Ofu figure below the king himself and, as in the time of Haneji Choshu, worked with the Sanshikan in matters of high-level decision-making, but the Sessei was not always an important figure. As Kerr observes, the amount of talent in the Sho family was actually limited, with the Sanshikan gradually becoming the primary decision-making body. Hence, the Sanshikan shifted in function throughout its history from a caretaker regency role, to second-highest body below Sessei, to key decision-maker in the absence of a strong Sessei. See George Kerr (1958), 123 and 186.
[8] Sai On's Rinsei hassho are presented in their entirety in Sakihama Shumei, ed. Sai On zenshu (Tokyo: Honpo Shoseki, 1984), 211-276. Selected details on the laws can be found in Kin-choshi, 66, and in Gregory Smits, Visions of Ryukyu: Identity and Ideology in Early-Modern Thought and Politics (1999), 189.
[9] These texts are nowadays referred to most commonly as the Rinsei hassho, or 'Eight Writings,' but only the above-mentioned seven were made into law during Sai On's administration. The eighth, according to Bollinger, was added in 1869. Edward E. Bollinger, Sai On, Okinawa’s Sage Reformer: An Introduction to His Life and Selected Works (Naha: Ryukyu Shimpo Sha, 1975), 244.
[10] There is precious little space to deal with the precise details of all these measures within this text. Those interested in somayama planting should consult Kin-choshi, pp. 67-69, somayama protection pp. 69-70, management pp. 70-71, and somayama utilisation pp. 71-72. Most of these details were obtained from Volume III of the Okinawa-kenshi.
[11] See Maeda Giken, Sai On: denki to shiso (Naha: Gekkan Okinawa Sha, Naha, 1976), 137.
[12] Basically, clerks or officials.
[13] In Kin magiri, the bisa's residence was located on the present day site of the Health and Welfare Office of the Kin Government, though this currently in the process of moving to the other side of town
[15] Simply described, there were three distinct social levels at this point in time: kizoku, shizoku, and heimin. The kizoku, or nobility, included the royal family, anji family, and those holding a rank above Wakijito. The shizoku, or privileged class, were persons with noble house lineage, anji descendants, or those having earned the status as a result of service to the Ofu. The highest shizoku rank was that of Wakijito family, and the lowest rank the shinzanshi (shinshizoku), who were a step above the heimin. The heimin, or commoners, were those with no family lineage, and peasants in both rural and urban areas. The term hakusho, or 'peasant farmer,' is interchangeable in this context since the Kin heimin were all essentially peasant farmers. Another term of the period is jibito (jinchu), or 'people of the land.' A Keizuza, or 'Genealogy Section,' in the Sashinosoba department of the Moshikuchiza was established in 1689 to trace ancestry, particularly within the shizoku ranks.
[16] Namisato-ku, Namisato-kushi: senzenshu (Kin: Namisato-ku Jimmusho, 1998), 183.
[17] Ibid., 187, Higa Shuncho, Okinawa no rekishi (1959), 255, and many other references.
[18] Namisato-kushi: senzenshu, 183-184.
[20] Sai On zenshu (1984), 282.
[21] The Omoro Soshi remains the best source for information on early village development in Okinawa. One should consult Sakihara Mitsugu A Brief History of Early Okinawa based on the Omoro Soshi (1987), 42-90, or, in Japanese, annotated versions of the Omoro Soshi by recognised scholars like Iha Fuyu, Nakahara Zenchu, or Hokama Shuzen.
[22] Higa Shuncho, Okinawa no rekishi (1959), 34.
[23] Apparently Eiso's lineage stretched back to Okinawa's legendary first 'descended-from-the-Gods-king,' Tenson, though this is purely the stuff of legend. Eiso certainly ruled out of Shuri Castle from 1260-1299, though we cannot say for certain what the precise geographical area of his domain was.
[24] Land was divided into nine parcels in a shape resembling a noughts and crosses grid. Each of eight farming families would cultivate the outer fields and keep the produce for themselves. The central plot of land was worked communally by the eight families, with the produce going to the local lord as tax. This system of land distribution was apparently in widespread use during the Chou Dynasty period from 1111-255 BC, and was advocated by the humanistic Confucian scholar Mencius as an ideal form of land distribution since it benefited both the peasant farmer and government. See the D.C. Lau translation of the Mencius (London: Penguin, 1970), especially Book 1-1.3 and Book 3-1.3.
[25] According to excerpts from Chinese records of the Qing Dynasty, Eiso is supposed to have toured "all his islands" before introducing these new systems. US OSS, The Okinawas of the Loo Choo Islands: A Japanese Minority Group, in Okinawa-kenshi, shiryohen 2 (1996), 48. We should perhaps be a little sceptical about the actual size of Eiso's dominion.
[26] See Kin-choshi, 188, and most other histories.
[27] The final survey presented to Satsuma authorities in Kagoshima in 1611 consisted of 270 volumes.
[28] The most important of these being carried out under King Sho Kei over a 13-year period from 1737-1750, the results of which are discussed below.
[29] The tax system implemented by Shimazu after 1609 is outlined earlier in this text.
[30] Information on land categories and distribution herein is aggregated from Kin-choshi, 187-195, Higa Shuncho, Okinawa no rekishi (1959), 244-248, Kunigami-gunshi, 133-135, Namisato-kushi: senzenshu, 203-208, and Higa Utaro, Nago roppyakkunenshi (Ginowan: Okinawa Aki Shobo, 1958), 56-76.
[31] The most appropriate term for the kind of 'government' of the day being kogi, or (royal) court.
[32] Higa Shuncho, Okinawa no rekishi (1959), 246. The total figure of all lands under cultivation at this time in Okinawa was 20,492 cho, with one cho equivalent to 0.992 hectares. Lands classified at hyakushochi added up to 13,815 cho, jitochi 2,798 cho, oekachi 1,450 cho, norokumoichi 267 cho.
[33] Prior to the establishment of the Shuri Ofu, of course, all lands were owned by the various anji and 'gifted' to the peasant farmers to cultivate.
[34] There appears immense variety in the period after which redistribution of land occurs. It could range from 2 years to 30 years. From what scant information exists, it would appear that redistribution occurred more frequently, varying between two, four and ten year intervals. Kin-choshi, 188-190.
[35] In the sense that the Ofu left responsibility for assessing and designating land parcels to the local community assemblies and leaders.
[36] Only after late-19th century Meiji land reforms did individual families became liable for taxes.
[37] Kin-choshi, 188-190.
[39] For example, Clarence Glacken, The Great Loochoo: A Study of Okinawan Village Life, (Rutland, Vermont: Charles Tuttle, 1960), 123.
[40] Today, there are still pieces of land, particularly within sacred forest areas, that are norokumoichi.
[41] See Sakihara's afterword in George Kerr, Okinawa: The History of an Island People (2000), 566.
[42] Groups could consist of magiri or mura level associations, or be simply farmer cooperatives.
[43] Owners received an ukechijo, or certificate of ownership, which allowed them to sell the land on. Kin-choshi, 194. A copy of a ukechijo can be found in Namisato-kushi: senzenshu, 207.
[44] Simply put, one of privileged class above the heimin, but just outside of the royal family. A lengthier explanation is given in footnote 129.

|
|
|