what's new?  |   archive  |   prehistoric ryukyu  |   ancient ryukyu  |   early-modern ryukyu  |   modern okinawa  |   postwar & contemporary okinawa  |  links  | contents  | about this website


managing a wild horse with a rotten rope: a contemporary history of okinawa


Chapter One

Part Three


1-3. The Dual Economic System of Ryukyu

Okinawa is a small, isolated island region with little in the way of natural resources. It has rarely achieved self-sufficiency, a condition only exacerbated during periods of population growth and natural disasters. Domestic constraints dictated an outward-looking economic policy. Traditional beliefs are consistent with this.[1] From the gusuku period of the 12th century to the unification of the sanzan in the early-15th century, population growth was never heavy enough to put excessive pressure on the productive capacity of the land or natural resources, but over the course of the next two centuries did. We know sweet potatoes (imo) were introduced at the start of the 17th century and sugar cultivation was also modernised to increase yields. Both crops fared well against typhoons, and imo very well under drought conditions. Logic dictates that droughts, famines, and damaging typhoons were common and these were attempted mitigating measures. At the same time, we can never appreciate the severity of famines or the harshness of conditions the hyakusho, or peasant farmer, endured. Although just speculation, it is probable that while suffering as other areas northern Okinawa was not experiencing the same population pressure as the southern part of the island, and that meagre resources were not spread as thinly. There were no limits on the people of Kin, for example, gathering whatever timber they required until 1679.[2] Restrictions in the south of the island were put into effect in 1628 when King Sho Ho established the Yamabugyo:[3] a division of the Monobugyosho of the ofu, to protect the somayama, or timber forests.[4]

In no dispute is the toughness of life for the hyakusho who dwelled in poorly-constructed houses and eked out, at best, a life of subsistence. It is probable that some communities were able to juggle food resources so that reserves were kept aside for times of hardship, but the anji would be collecting on his percentage of the harvest and there was the Ofu, which owned all of the lands, to support. The degree to which the anji may have been lenient on the households in his magiri during times of famine is unclear. A solitary clue we have in this regard in the case of Kin, for example, is a verse from the Omoro Soshi pertaining to the 14th century. In it the local people celebrate the aged anji, presenting him with shinshu, or 'God's sake,' to wish upon him a long and prosperous life.[5] A better indication of everyday life might be the prevalence of animistic systems of belief and rituals specific to agrarian communities, such as warding off typhoons or bringing good fortune during planting seasons. There is also a system of yuimaru,[6] or community interdependence. In predominantly agrarian communities far from Shuri within which people toiled under conditions of extreme hardship there was the recognition that if they did not stand and work together they would likely perish.[7]

The poverty of the hyakusho has to be contrasted with the developing splendour of Shuri and wealth of the Ofu, nobility, and elite. The tributary relationship established with China in 1372 brought immediate benefits for Chuzan, and thereafter the unified state.[8] China provided capital and goods with which Chuzan could initiate a system of maritime trade. The idea was that Ryukyuan ships would use the capital to acquire exotic goods[9] from Southeast Asia which would be brought back to the Ming Court, part as tribute but most for resale.[10] The Ming Court reimbursed the costs of the tribute mission and provided fresh goods. Since the value of commodities differed wildly according to region[11] there were huge profits to be made. The port at Naha became the commercial centre of this import-export trade. Locating Ryukyu within the political economy of Asia at the time, two types of state can be identified. First, there were the large, agrarian-based imperial formations like the Ottomans, Safavids, Vijayanagara, Mogals, Ming, and Mataram in Java,[12] for whom maritime trade was of little interest.[13] Second, were the smaller, predominantly trade-based coastal states: like Kilwa in West Africa, Calicut in Southwest India, and Malacca, and island states: such as Hurmuz and Ryukyu, which occupied "strategic 'choke-points' along key trade routes."[14] The political status of Hurmuz and Ryukyu was different: with Ryukyu being a tributary state of the Ming, and Hurmuz having tributary states in the Persian Gulf, but commonalties in economic structure existed. Both were driven to trade as a result of limited resources. Ryukyu’s geostrategic location was between Japan, Korea, China, and Southeast Asia, but since its ships regularly visited Malacca: the key trade entrepot, one can link the kingdom to a trade network which spread from the Sultanate to India, the Persian Gulf, the Red Sea, to Southern Africa and Madagascar, and beyond.

The era from the late-14th to late-16th century was one of prosperity for Shuri. It is estimated that from 1425 to 1570, over a hundred ships set sail from Naha, via Fukien or Guangzhou on the southern coast of China, to places like Luzon, Siam, Palembang, Java, Malacca, Sumatra, Patani, Annam, and Sunda in Southeast Asia.[15] During the same period, Ryukyuan ships conducted regular voyages to Korea and Japan. The spirit of the era is captured in an inscription on a temple bell installed in Shuri Castle in 1458, which talks of bankoku no shinryo, or ships replacing bridges to connect the Ryukyu Kingdom with the rest of the world.[16] One reason for the creation of a contemporary mythology surrounding Ryukyu is that while 200-years of considerable prosperity for the Ofu can hardly be described as ephemeral, it is certainly an aberrant period in the context of Okinawa's economic history. Firstly, the most profitable period of trade for Ryukyu was as a result of the reinstitution of traditional Confucian values which led to a shift in Ming policy toward commerce in the early- to mid-15th century. Maritime expeditions and further ship construction were banned. China, still in need of such goods it could no longer acquire itself, depended on vassal states, like Ryukyu. Shuri was happy to run errands and fulfil tributary commitments to the Ming Court whilst also conducting profitable non-tributary trade. Advances in domestic shipbuilding minimised the loss when China decided vessels would no longer be provided as gifts to Ryukyu.[17]

China’s self-imposed isolationism had long-term consequences for itself and Ryukyu. European countries were already expanding outwards, seeing Asia, Africa, and the Americas, as ripe for exploitation. By the mid-15th century, Portugal was utilising the Azores in the mid-Atlantic as a stop-off point on voyages east and west. The construction of better vessels brought India within reach by the late-15th century, and Southeast Asia by the 16th century. Portugal seized Malacca in 1511. Ryukyuan ships did not return there nor to Patani after 1543. A withdrawal from Southeast Asia culminated in a last mission to Siam in 1570. Thereafter, Ryukyu trade was in less-exotic goods and limited to China, Japan, and Korea. The catalyst for economic decline was principally Europe's advance into Asia, but the reappearance of Chinese merchants and an increasing number of Japanese vessels in the same waters were no less important. Yet the real problem was internal and systemic. It stemmed from the fact that success was not a result of endogenous factors, beyond geographic position, and was therefore unsustainable. Ryukyu's fortune was linked to its suzerain. The transit trade economy was initiated with Ming capital and technology, was possible because of its tributary status under China’s aegis, and was founded on the shipment of non-domestically produced goods.[18] The economy developed to serve the needs of Ming China. As Ming influence diminished under European pressure in the late-16th century, so too did Ryukyu’s ability to conduct a maritime economy. If not fulfilling this role Ryukyu had little to fall back on. The basis of Shuri's wealth, therefore, was fragile and subject to swift change; its destiny determined largely by factors beyond its control. Such conditions persisted through most of Ryukyu's history and are defining characteristics even in contemporary Okinawa.



[1] Okinawans have long regarded the sea as a source of good. Legends talk of a sea paradise, or nirai kanai (nira, niran, or nirya): an eternal fire beyond the eastern horizon from which the sun, fire, grain, and human life originated. Yanagita Kunio, 'On the Palace of the Sea-God,' Minzokugaku Kenkyu 2 (1950), 239. Yanagita asserts that this Ryukyuan belief is similar to the Japanese idea of Ryugu, or Dragon Palace. On nirai kanai see 'Tales Concerning the Origins of Grains in the Insular Areas of Eastern and Southeastern Asia,' in Mabuchi Toichi, Ethnology of the Southwestern Pacific: The Ryukyus-Taiwan-Insular Southeast Asia (Taipei: Orient Cultural Service, 1974), 70-82. It should be noted that a belief in a similar mythical paradise was one reason why Zhu Kuan was dispatched by the Sui Emperor Yangdi on a voyage of exploration, incidentally bumping into Okinawa. Chinese beliefs likely underlie the Ryukyu and Japanese variants. A logical extension is that people who arrive from the sea can also be a source of good. Two ideas evolved in this regard. The marebito, or 'sacred guest' concept holds that visitors from afar are potential bearers of new technical knowledge or information and should be extended hospitality. Another, ichariba chode, translates as "if once we meet, even by chance, we are as brothers." The idea of marebito may be found in Okinawan and Japanese belief systems, having the sense of divine or supernatural beings bringing luck and wealth from the spiritual world. Arguably, in Japan the concept is known only in the most metaphysical of senses, whereas in Okinawa it was practically applied in dealings with foreigners. In contemporary Japan one finds ill-fitting terms like kokusaika (internationalisation) or kokusai koryu (international exchange) bandied around on occasions when Japanese people find themselves formally intermingling with foreigners. Sadly, Okinawa has adopted the same kokusai obsession since reversion, despite the fact that traditional Okinawan belief systems have a wealth more practical terms. There is no Japanese equivalent for ichariba chode. The closest in meaning would arguably be the proverb sode furiau mo tasho no en, or "even a chance acquaintance is decreed [preordained] by destiny," but this Japanese concept is different from ichariba chode. It is based on the Buddhist idea of cause and effect and is therefore, again, highly metaphysical. One is hard-pressed to find anything relating to the concept of brotherhood in the practical sense within Japanese philosophy.

[2] Kin-cho, Kin-choshi (Kin: Kin-cho, 1984), 65.

[3] Ibid., 65. The word is generally rendered as bugyo (magistrate), but in Kin-choshi the pronunciation is given as 'bujo.'

[4] There were two divisions of the Ofu responsible for general affairs: the Monobugyosho and Moshikuchiza (or Moshikuchiho). The new Yamabugyo fell under the Yoiho of the former section. The heads of the most important government sections would form the Omote Jugonin, or 'Council of Fifteen.' The next level was the Sanshikan, which was literally a 'Council of Three' but practically a 'Council of State.' The most important body in the Ofu was the Hyojosho (or Byojojo), which may be rendered as 'High Council.' This combined the Sanshikan with the Sessei (or Sessho), a position perhaps best given in English as 'Chancellor' or 'Prime Minister.' All good histories contain plentiful references to these terms and offices. The chart on page 268 of Higa Shuncho's Okinawa no rekishi (1959) is perhaps the most straightforward outline of the hierarchy. The glossary on pages 165-167 of Gregory Smits' Visions of Ryukyu: Identity and Ideology in Early-Modern Thought and Politics (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1999), provides the best English descriptions.

[5] Volume 17, Verse 1-1175. "Omoro Kotaratsuka, hiyakusa omishaku, sashiyowaha, mo iki nokasu, mata Kin no yono nushi ni, hiyakusa mishaku." Hokama Shuzen, Omoro saushi (Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten, 1993), 424.

[6] It is a word often used, particularly when something traditional is being sold or promoted abroad (or Japanese mainland), yet with little sense of the peasant farmer solidarity roots of the term. Yuimaru, as in the case of other ideas, is part of Okinawan mythology and, as such, become somewhat twisted in meaning. In contemporary Okinawa, beyond small agrarian communities, there is little evidence of any sense of community interdependence. While appreciating the quality of life now enjoyed, many bemoan the erosion of traditional values such as yuimaru.

[7] In the Ando Emiko translation of Takanoya's 'An Account of Okinawan Culture' (Fuzoku Gaho, June 1896), reference is made to a peasant proverb: "Even though one suffers from a painful incurable illness, he can repose in peace if he can sip a bowl of rice gruel." In Douglas G. Haring, ed. Okinawan Customs: Yesterday and Today  (Rutland, Vermont: Charles Tuttle, 1969), 100. Haring rightly points out that Takanoya has a tendency to exaggerate in cultural observations. 

[8] Between 1385 and 1439, Shuri received 30 ships, most of which carried a large cargo and 250 men. Sakamaki Shunzo, 'Ryukyu and Southeast Asia,' Journal of Asian Studies 3 (1964), 387.

[9] Like sapanwood, cloves, nutmeg, camphor, ivory, sandalwood, perfumes, mercury, opium, saffron,  muslin, olibanum, eaglewood, costusroot, rhinoceros horn, animals and birds, ebony, agate, and resin.

[10] In terms of tributary items the Ming Court favoured sulphur and horses from Ryukyu.

[11] Sapanwood sold in China for 100 times the price in Ryukyu, and many hundred times the purchase price in Southeast Asia. Pepper sold in China for up to 1500 times the original cost. Ibid., 387.

[12] Sanjay Subrahmanyam, The Portuguese Empire in Asia, 1500-1700: A Political and Economic History (London: Longman, 1993), 11.

[13] China was certainly involved in maritime trade during the first three decades of the 15th century, venturing as far as the Eastern coast of Africa, but then withdrew, thereafter relying principally on its vassal states for the acquisition of luxury goods.

[14] Sanjay Subrahmanyam, The Portuguese Empire in Asia (1993), 11.

[15] Shunzo Sakamaki, 'Ryukyu and Southeast Asia,' Journal of Asian Studies 3 (1964), 384, Maehira Fusaaki, '15-16 seiki ni okeru Ryukyu Tonan Ajia boeki no rekishiteki zentei,' Ryudai Review of History 12 (1981), 49. Information on Ryukyuan voyages in East and Southeast Asia during this period is from the Rekidai hoan (Lidai baoan), or 'Precious Documents from all Historical Eras.' It was kept by successive Ryukyu kings covering almost 450 years of investiture and trade missions.

[16] In full: "The Kingdom of Ryukyu is a place of pure beauty located in the South Sea. Gathered here are treasures of the three countries of Korea, the Great Ming, and Japan. It is a Treasure Island which emerged from the sea between China and Japan. Its ships act as bridges between 10,000 countries. It is filled with wonderful things which may be seen everywhere." This is aggregated from various sources, none of which is a perfect translation of the original text. The expression bankoku shinryo is part of contemporary mythology. It appears in the OPG's recent socio-economic development plans.

[17] The rapid expansion of domestic ship production was a major cause of forest depletion on Okinawa.

[18] Initially, of course, domestically produced horses and sulphur were items China preferred in tribute.



the ryukyu-okinawa history and culture website © 1995-2009 john michael purves

 somayama@me.com